Why Are Names Capitalized in Legal Documents

No one. I. A human being (a “physical” person). 2. A company (an “artificial” person). Companies are treated as persons in many legal situations. In addition, the word “person” includes businesses in most definitions in this dictionary. 3. Any other “being” entitled to bring an action as a corporation (a government, an association, a group of trustees, etc.). 4.The plural of person is persons, not persons (see this word). [Oran`s “Dictionary of Law”, West Group (1999)] Many people are involved in careful research on the use of all capital letters for proper names, e.g. John Paul Jones replacing John Paul Jones in all court documents, driver`s licenses, bank accounts, birth certificates, etc.

Is the use of all capitalization to designate a name a special English rule or style of grammar? Is it a contemporary American English style? Is the use of this form of capitalization recognized by the education authorities? Is this an official U.S. government rule and/or a grammar style? Why do lawyers, court clerks, prosecutors, judges, insurance companies, banks, credit card companies, utilities, etc. always use capital letters when writing a proper name? “In case titles, the first letter of all names is capitalized, but not terms such as defendant and appellant.” If you really want to know the law itself about amateur legal theories (and not what an amateur law theorist tells you is the law), then THE LAW BELOW IS FOR YOU. “. the legal fiction that a day has no fraction Fields vs. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 818 P.2d658 (1991). One of the leading authorities on the grammar, style, composition, and rules of American English is the Chicago Manual of Style. The latest edition (14th), published by the University of Chicago Press, is internationally known and respected as an important contribution to maintaining and improving the standards of written and printed texts. Since we can`t find any reference in their manual to using all capital letters with a proper name or other usage, we wrote to the editors and asked this question: Your official name, used by the government to identify you (a body of water or liquid), is written in CAPITAL letters because it is a liquidated piece of capital.

In other words, it was securitized and converted into a financial instrument. Hence the term “liquidated capital”. The examples presented in ` 17.12 are also consistent with specification ` 17.9` above: i.e. all proper names must be capitalized; Balance of each lowercase. In fact, Lincoln`s second decree abolished the English common law recognized in America and replaced it with “laws” based on a fictitious legal basis, that is, decrees and directives executed under the “authority” of the belligerent powers. Most states still have a reference to common laws in their current laws. For example, in the Florida Statutes (1999), Title I. Chapter 2, in ` 2.01 `Common law and certain statutes declared in force`: Chapter 3, `Capitalization`, in ` 3.2, prescribes rules for proper names: The use of capital letters in contracts results from legal interpretation, compositional skills, and tradition. Even though some of the circumstances that made this necessary no longer exist today, capital letters still prevail.

In any case, a legal fiction is an assumption of an alleged fact without having proved that the fact was true or valid. It is an acceptance without proof. To simply accept is to pretend. Oran`s “Dictionary of Law” says that the word “accept” means: 9. United States vs Rodney Class, Crim. Action No. 13-253 (GK), United States District Court, District Of Columbia (16. April 2014) (judgment against Class`s amateur legal theories on: the “capital letter” theory, the “fictitious entity” theory, the “registered business name” theory, the “single business code” theory, his false claims that he is a “private attorney general” [which actually means a “public interest plaintiff” and whose temporary status ends at the end of the case], his false claims that the statutes “apply only to corporations, state institutions, and other entities, but not to individuals like him” [citing the United States Tax Code, the Texas Administrative Code, and the Delaware Administrative Code], his false Cla Lincoln`s Second Executive Order of April 1861 summoned Congress a few days later, but not under the legal authority or due process of the Constitution.